Consultation on the Curriculum and Assessment (Wales) Bill
Evidence submitted to the Children, Young People and Education Committee for Stage 1 scrutiny of the Curriculum and Assessment (Wales) Bill.
Individual
1. The Bill’s general principles
1.1 Do you support the principles of the Curriculum and Assessment (Wales) Bill?
No
1.2 Please outline your reasons for your answer to question 1.1
(we would be grateful if you could keep your answer to around 1500 words)
1 RSE is being mandated for with little explanation or documentation to back up this huge and important change.
2 There is evidence of a global roll out of sexuality education which I believe you people are unaware of. If you are aware then I am afraid you are complicit in child sexual exploitation. This is not welcome in our country and is also a criminal offence.
3 The evidence to support the global roll out was carried out on mostly third world countries.
4 Explanatory notes refer to England where a pilot scheme began encouraging sexual stimulation in 4 yr olds. This package is directly from the United Nations, but you should already know this. Why else would you risk this behaviour or mandate for such a subject from aged 3yrs old.
5 Lack of safeguarding and widespread training , therefore a negligent service throughout.
1.3 Do you think there is a need for legislation to deliver what this Bill is trying to achieve?
(we would be grateful if you could keep your answer to around 500 words)
6 Mandated subjects are English, Welsh, RVE , & RSE , do you honestly believe these 4 subjects are relevant for adult life and how to function in society ?. It is a load of nonsense.
7 The bill makes no provision for parents to be able to withdraw their children from RVE or RSE. I believe this is a breach of parents rights to respect for their religious and philosophical convictions under article 2 protocol 1 ( right to education) and their right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion under article 9 of the European convention of human rights.
2. The Bill’s implementation
2.1 Do you have any comments about any potential barriers to implementing the Bill? If no, go to question 3.1
(we would be grateful if you could keep your answer to around 500 words)
Yes, we are taking you to court if you do not remove RSE from the mandatory element.
RSE is part of a well documented global roll out of sexuality education, scientific evidence points to models of child sexual exploitation.
The bill makes no provision for parents to be able to withdraw their children from RVE or RSE. This is a breach of parents rights to respect for their religious and philosophical convictions under article 2 protocol 1 , right to education. And their right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion under article 9 of the European convention for human rights.
2.2 Do you think the Bill takes account of these potential barriers?
(we would be grateful if you could keep your answer to around 500 words)
Not at all, hence why have you gone over our heads after online polls which many did NOT have access to ?
3. Unintended consequences
3.1 Do you think there are there any unintended consequences arising from the Bill? If no, go to question 4.1
(we would be grateful if you could keep your answer to around 500 words)
Yes , RSE is part of a well documented global roll out of sex education, this education does not suit our country by way of legislation, research , nor does it take into account any local issues. A policy from Swansea cannot be applied to London yet a global roll out of sinister sex education is ?...
4. Financial implications
4.1 Do you have any comments on the financial implications of the Bill (as set out in Part 2 of the Explanatory Memorandum)? If no, go to question 5.1
(we would be grateful if you could keep your answer to around 500 words)
How much public money will be wasted on court battles ? , I would like to see the people responsible for this to stand by their convictions and pay for the fall out.
We will fight you whatever you decide.
5. Powers to make subordinate legislation
5.1 Do you have any comments on the appropriateness of the powers in the Bill for Welsh Ministers to make subordinate legislation (as set out in Chapter 5 of Part 1 of the Explanatory Memorandum). If no, go to question 6.1.
(we would be grateful if you could keep your answer to around 500 words)
It is wholly inappropriate based on the RSE element and there is no opt out provision. The bill makes no provision for parents to be able to withdraw their children.
This is a breach of parents rights .
6. Other considerations
6.1 Do you have any other points you wish to raise about this Bill?
(we would be grateful if you could keep your answer to around 1000 words)
The bill makes no provision for parents to be able to withdraw their children from RVE or RSE . I believe this is a breach of parents rights to respect for their religious and philosophical convictions under article 2 protocol 1(right to education) and their right to freedom of thought , conscience and religion under article 9of the European convention on human rights.
Neither of you are qualified to to make this decision. You have hidden from our questions, some have even denied all knowledge of this and blocked constituents. We will therefore see you in court. We will protect our children.